Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Sassir
  • 2.3k
  • 3
  • 19
  • 42
added 140 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Kilise
  • 3k
  • 5
  • 28
  • 59

Which sunni scholars deny naskh tilawa (removed verses from the quran)?

I understand that most scholars believe in abrogated verses in the Quran, while they differ on the conditions needed to claim a verse to be abrogated. Some fully deny the theory of abrogation in the Quran. Some scholars seems also deny naskh tilawa (i.e removed verses from the Quran).

Which sunni scholars deny naskh tilawa?
These scholars also (or automatically) deny the ahadith which speaks about certain verses been removed from the quran, such as the one mentioned in this question, and the hadith of Aicha (1,2).

When I mention scholars in my quesiton, I include (all kinds of) scholars: hadith, al-usuliyoun (of usul al fiqh), fiqh, tafsir.

Which scholars deny naskh tilawa (removed verses from the quran)?

I understand that most scholars believe in abrogated verses in the Quran, while they differ on the conditions needed to claim a verse to be abrogated. Some fully deny the theory of abrogation in the Quran. Some scholars seems also deny naskh tilawa (i.e removed verses from the Quran).

Which scholars deny naskh tilawa?
These scholars also (or automatically) deny the ahadith which speaks about certain verses been removed from the quran, such as the one mentioned in this question, and the hadith of Aicha (1,2).

Which sunni scholars deny naskh tilawa (removed verses from the quran)?

I understand that most scholars believe in abrogated verses in the Quran, while they differ on the conditions needed to claim a verse to be abrogated. Some fully deny the theory of abrogation in the Quran. Some scholars seems also deny naskh tilawa (i.e removed verses from the Quran).

Which sunni scholars deny naskh tilawa?
These scholars also (or automatically) deny the ahadith which speaks about certain verses been removed from the quran, such as the one mentioned in this question, and the hadith of Aicha (1,2).

When I mention scholars in my quesiton, I include (all kinds of) scholars: hadith, al-usuliyoun (of usul al fiqh), fiqh, tafsir.

added 25 characters in body
Source Link
Kilise
  • 3k
  • 5
  • 28
  • 59

I understand that most scholars believe in abrogated verses in the Quran, while they differ on the conditions of abrogationsneeded to claim a verse to be abrogated. Some fully deny the theory of abrogation in the Quran. Some scholars seems also deny naskh tilawa (i.e removed verses from the Quran).

Which scholars deny naskh tilawa?
These scholars also (or automatically) deny the ahadith which speaks about certain verses been removed from the quran, such as the one mentioned in this question, and the hadith of Aicha (1,2).

I understand that most scholars believe in abrogated verses in the Quran, while they differ on the conditions of abrogations. Some fully deny the theory of abrogation in the Quran. Some scholars seems also deny naskh tilawa (i.e removed verses from the Quran).

Which scholars deny naskh tilawa?
These scholars also (or automatically) deny the ahadith which speaks about certain verses been removed from the quran, such as the one mentioned in this question, and the hadith of Aicha (1,2).

I understand that most scholars believe in abrogated verses in the Quran, while they differ on the conditions needed to claim a verse to be abrogated. Some fully deny the theory of abrogation in the Quran. Some scholars seems also deny naskh tilawa (i.e removed verses from the Quran).

Which scholars deny naskh tilawa?
These scholars also (or automatically) deny the ahadith which speaks about certain verses been removed from the quran, such as the one mentioned in this question, and the hadith of Aicha (1,2).

Source Link
Kilise
  • 3k
  • 5
  • 28
  • 59
Loading