Regarding the Hadith :
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said: "I have been commanded to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning will be done by Allah."
[ Bukhari ]
Ibn Taymiyyah commented on this Hadith
The meaning of this hadith is to fight those who are waging war whom God has called us to fight, and it does not mean to fight those who have made peace agreements with whom Allah has commanded us to fulfill the agreements. And the Prophet, before the revelation of Surat al-Tawba would uphold agreements with whoever made agreements with him from the kuffar without imposing jizya. So when Allah revealed Surat al-Tawba and commanded the Prophet to renege the indefinite agreements, he could no longer make agreements as he used to do. Rather he was obligated to fight jihad against everyone , as Allah says in the verse 9:5
[ Majmu Fatawa ]
So it appears to me Ibn taymiyya interprets the hadith to refer to Self defense, but he interprets 9:5 (which is pretty much saying the same thing as the hadith) to command jihad against everyone Thats very contradictory
Just to make sure I ask you guys i am not mis interpreting ibn taymiyya’s view on the hadith right?