5

Do not waste water, even if you perform your ablution on the banks of an abundantly-flowing river

-Ibn Majah

Is this hadith authentic? if it is not authentic, should Muslims still act on it?

Improve this question

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
5

This hadith appears in the collection of Ibn Majah, under the chapter "Concerning Moderation In Ablution And Avoiding Extravagance." This particular chain is classed "weak." link

However, this hadith appears in other collections. In particular, the version in Musnad Ahmad is graded Sahih by Ahmad Shakir. Al-Albani also collected this hadith in his Silsilah As-Sahihah (#3292) and graded it Hasan. The main disagreement appears to be over one of the narrators in the chain: Abdullah b. Lahi'ah, whose ability to narrate is differed upon. Another muhaddith Ala'addin Mughltai said the chain is weak but in meaning the hadith is Sahih.

In any case, the general principle of avoiding extravagance is established by strong ahadith, and the jurists say that in such a case acting on more specific but weak ahadith that point to virtue is permissible. Even if one were to not act on the exact words of this hadith there are plenty of other hadith (look at the hadith above and below this one in Sunan Ibn Majah) that document the little water with which the Prophet (saws) made wudu, his (saws) general warnings against extravagance, and his command to us to make wudu like he made wudu.

Reference: dorar.net

Improve this answer
0

The most correct rule on weak ahadith is to judge both the chain of narrators, the Isnaad as well as the content, the Matn. If in as is the case here the chain is weak but the content is strong and not in any disagreement with other ahadith or the Qur-aan then we may retain the hadith as long as we are not using such hadith to implement laws such as inheritance, divorce etc.

Improve this answer
2
  • Salam and Welcome to Islam.SE, we suggest you read the FAQ. I am sorry, but your answer does not answer the question, the questions is asking for a Hadith and it's authenticity, not what and how authenticity is judged. Also your answer contains no citations, here we require citations or references in Answers. you may like looking at the questions under the tags: ajarh-wa-tadeel and ilm-al-hadith. We are looking forward to having you as an active member on here, and welcome again to Islam.SE
    – مجاهد
    Commented Feb 14, 2013 at 11:54
  • 2
    This is the start of a good answer. We typically expect an answer to stand on its own; given that there is no isnad provided in the question itself, explaining in this answer (or at least summarizing) why this particular chain is weak but the content is strong would make it much more robust (if other answers have already done so, you can mention and/or link them to support your own, but a quick summary is still recommended in case the other post gets changed or deleted)
    – goldPseudo
    Commented Feb 14, 2013 at 15:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .