I married about a year ago. Now I have a suspicion that my spouse may have had extramarital sexual relations before our wedding night.

Would our Nikah be affected in any way if there had been no repentance before our marriage?

  • 1
    How did you figure out this it might help you islamqa.info/en/60235 – Faqirah Feb 8 '17 at 18:58
  • 1
    Did she tell you? or, is this your assumption based on her behaviour? – Sakib Arifin Feb 8 '17 at 19:21
  • Well i could tell first because there was no bleeding + it was easy. She did not tell me but i could tell from her behavior too. Later i just asked why she didn't bleed but she stayed put. – Diamond Programmer Feb 9 '17 at 5:11
  • Bleeding is not important for virginity. Before marriage bleeding is possible, by many reasons. It may have been done by diseases or lifting heavy weights(like big box or large bucket etc). – Seeker Mar 15 '17 at 9:33
  • I'm sure she was not a virgin and my question is not about whether she was virgin or not, suppose she's not virgin, then consider my question. – Diamond Programmer Mar 15 '17 at 16:32

From what I can gather, you suspect your wife to be a non-virgin and fornicator based on some observations on your part (she hasn't confessed to it, nor do you have proper evidence like testimonies or medical reports, nor do you have any evidence that she is still engaged in such a relationship) and you are interpreting Quran 24:3 to mean that marriage with fornicators in not permissible and hence invalid (The Hanbali view that repentance is required).

Firstly: Legal judgements must always be based on concrete evidence and suspicion does not count no matter how convinced you are. There can be several alternate explanations for her physical symptoms and behavior such as masturbation, porn, accidents and natural variations etc. She could also be a non-virgin but not a fornicator (e.g. if she was previously married and divorced but did not tell you so). Verse 24:3 applies to habitually and openly immoral characters like prostitutes (see azbab ul nazool) or those convicted of fornication and punished (see Abu Daud's hadith), the view of the majority of the scholars is that it applies to habitual and continuing fornicators (prostitutes) and marriage with a non-habitual, convicted fornicator is allowed.

From Tafsir Al Qurtubi on 24:3, regarding marrying a past fornicator:

إنّ من زنى بامرأة فله أن يتزوجها ولغيره أن يتزوّجها. وهو قول ابن عمر وسالم وجابر بن زيد وعطاء وطاوس ومالك بن أنس، وهو قول أبي حنيفة وأصحابه. وقال الشافعيّ: القول فيها كما قال سعيد بن المسيّب، إن شاء الله هي منسوخة.

One who has fornicated with a woman, it is permissible for him to marry her, and it is also permissible for another man to marry the fornicatress. This is the view of Ibn Umar, Salim, Jabir bin Zayed, Ata, Taus and Imam Malik bin Ans. The same is the view of Imam Abu Hanifa and his companions. Imam Shafi said that the matter is as Saeed bin Musaib said: that God willing it is abrogated.

Secondly: Legal judgements are always made based on actions and not speculations about what one has in his or her heart. Repentance for her means that she does not engage in immoral activities anymore, you can't judge what remorse she feels in her heart ... If she does not engage in fornication anymore your marriage is valid and you can't judge whether she has properly repented. If she is openly defiant and continues to engage in immoral activity it is the view of some that the marriage is automatically dissolved, and of others that it isn't automatically dissolved but you should divorce her.

For more information see this.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.