I asked a related question earlier, trying to understand the sudden, catastrophic decline of the Bani Hashim from the high point during the early adulthood of Abd al-Muttalib to the low point at the time of Muhammad's birth.

The most plausible answer I've seen so far is posited by historian Hussain Mo’ones. He says that the problems started when Abd al-Muttalib retired and passed his duties to his son Az-Zubair. At that point the leaders of the other Qurayshi clans overpowered the efforts of Az-Zubair to enforce honest trade with the caravans. This made it impossible for Az-Zubair to make any profit. Because of his obligations of hospitality to pilgrims, he eventually ran the entire clan of Hashim out of money.

So the other Qurayshi clans were powerful enough, disrespectful enough, and dishonest enough, to drive the Bani Hashim from the high point of Zamzam into poverty and low status.

But if the other Qurayshi clans had the power and the lack of scruples to drive the Hashim into poverty and ignobility, and even to force a debilitating boycott/siege on the Hashim, why would they have respected Abu Talib's formal protection of Muhammad?

  • 1
    Why do you think the Quraish must've yet developed malicious intentions towards Muhammad in that period of his life (i.e before his ministry) regardless of their greed-driven intrusions into Bani Hashim's wealth? Quraish could care less about Abu Talib raising an orphan than did Jews who predicted and feared the rise of an Arab Prophet who was to terminate their proclaimed exclusive dominion over mankind. – infatuated Jul 25 '16 at 14:02
  • I don't mean malice before his ministry. I mean great power and lack of scruples that started before his ministry. Then during his ministry, when they grew tired of him, their great power and lack of scruples would have emboldened them to ignore the usual customs of protection. Or so it seems to me. That's what I'm confused about. – SaganRitual Jul 25 '16 at 14:24
  • 1
    Maybe because they held those customs in greater respect that we might imagine. But even that didn't stop them from pressuring Abu Talib to withheld his support from the Holy Prophet, and you must've read about economic siege that they ultimately imposed on the Hashim clan. – infatuated Jul 25 '16 at 18:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.