In case of conflict between suggestions (imarat) and practical principles, Shia largely believe in precedence of the imarat. So my question is: “What's the view by other schools (Sunni scholars)?"
For example, if a suggestion comes into conflict with a preservation (istis'hab) or an option-grant (takhyir), what do the jurists of the four school have to say?
Note: the definition of imarat /اماره can be considered as the following explanations:
- The presumptions in source methodology in Islamic jurisprudence
- The evidence which leads to a speculative reasoning
- The indication leading to a speculative reasoning
- The credible suspicion sign/proof