Who was the originator of the doctrine of Taqlid? Which school of thought,if any in particular,propounded it first? And the term"doors of ijtihad are closed",what are the origins of this later term as well?

  • 'Consensus that there shouldn't be ijtihad outside 4 Sunni madhabs' by whom? Is it a part of 'common' understanding among majority of Muslims or has there been some research done on that topic? Where can I find that research work? What is the reasoning behind such consensus?
    – user13538
    Commented Aug 23, 2015 at 15:57
  • There seems to be an implicit universal consensus on this topic,yet it's hard to find proper corresponding knowledge base.'The effort' it seems is being made for preservation of sanctity of that consensus,arguably the exact opposite of 'independent reasoning'.We know by necessary implication that no two persons can perceive God in the same way.And we know from historical experience that change is inevitable.Finally,Ijtihad means 'independent reasoning' and 'effort..',as given in those links u mentioned.These points taken as a whole,pose grave contradictions.Please explain what am I missing?
    – user13538
    Commented Aug 24, 2015 at 6:58

1 Answer 1


Taqlid means to follow someone without demanding a proof or an evidence. It really is a style of thinking or a (behavioral) preference of an individual. Its hard to exactly pinpoint a specific time when people started doing it, or to name a person who initiated it. It relates to a society's behavior and such phenomenon requires time to manifest them fully. Such phenomenon also get hastened if they get the approval of the Government. Perhaps, if one asks, why and how taqleed came to be about, he could uncover who started it. I try to list some of them.

  • As Islam spread to wider areas, the new converts who had little knowledge of Arabic relied on understanding of someone who appears to be righteous.

  • State Patronage: Support from the state in return of the Fiqh Jursits' legitimization of the Government. Thus the religion became a tool to control the masses.

    • Early Abbasids patronized Fiqh Hanafi (Its altogether a different story how it came to be as Abu Hanafi was against it and he was imprisoned and killed by the Khalifa. His fiqh was implemented by his student Abu Yusuf)
    • Malikis enjoyed patronage under the second Ummayyad dynasty in Spain and parts of North Africa in return for their support for the regime.
    • Ismailis got the support from Fatimids in Egypt
    • Shafi were devoid of early patronage but later dynasties such as Seljuks, Mamluks, and Ayyubids lent it their support.
    • Jafari/Asna-Ashari was adopted by Safavids as the jurists provided them the legitimacy and desireability until the Mehdi arrives.
    • Hanbali received the least state patronage (by Ottomans and then the Sauds) and unsurprisingly is the smallest in terms of followers.
  • @mod: the nature of question is such that an exact answer if not impossible is very difficult to come up with. If somebody raise an objection or a suggestion, I would try to modify it. Commented Sep 9, 2015 at 8:13
  • 1
    'It relates to society's behaviour..." That's one possible answer.Is it then safe to assume the doctrine has no religious basis?
    – user13538
    Commented Sep 9, 2015 at 16:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .