I have come across many people who say dogs are impure or that I have to wash myself if a dog touches me or if I touch a dog.

Is there any evidence for this belief?

Evidence: Quran and authentically proven sayings of the Prophet.


2 Answers 2


Yes they are, because of that the Prophet ordered us to clean a vessel which has been licked by a dog, seven times the first with soil.

Muslim (279) narrated that Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The purification of the vessel of one of you, if a dog licks it, is to wash it seven times, the first time with soil.”

You can take a look at this link and this link for more informations.

  • 4
    This doesn't say dogs are impure...What if a pig licks a vessel? We don't have to wash it 7 times.
    – Sayyid
    Commented Mar 31, 2014 at 20:17
  • 2
    @Sayyid, this does say dog is impure. Since a dog licking a vessel means you have to wash it. This is only for dogs. But it doesn't say touching them is impure. However, touching a dog doesn't make you lose your wudu. As for pigs, no source can be found talking about pigs.
    – Sohaeb
    Commented May 1, 2014 at 21:02
  • I agree with Sayyid on this. In maliki madhab, the dog is actually not considered impure. The one that understands Arabic should listen to this (maliki scholar explains about the dog in the maliki madhab) youtube.com/watch?v=U0R5chzw3Q8 And if someone doesn't understand Arabic, then to comment about if it's pure or not would just be wrong. The links you have linked are from ONE understanding.
    – Kilise
    Commented Feb 4, 2016 at 14:27

This saying has no basis neither in Quran nor Sunna. It might be an overdraw interpretation of ahadith which prohibit eating their meat (Sahih Muslim 1 2 which considers them as part of as-siba-a السِّبَاعِ or as a conclusion from this hadith in sahih al-Bukhari and this from sahih Muslim as it's forbidden to sell them they shouldn't be eaten) or about purification if the spittle of a dog touches something! So only their spittle is impure! But even this hadith is questionable Imam Malik said about it "The hadith came and I don't know his reality" as it clearly contradicts to the fact that the spittle of hunting animals are pure. Imam Malik, al-Awza'i and others therefore considered the cleaning of the vessels as a ritual matter while others (like the Hanafis, Shafi'is and Hanbalis) considered it as a cleaning due to najassa. Note that -assuming the dogs are najis- other siba-a are not considered as najis by this hadith (which appears in the four sunan). So are dogs an exception?

Dogs are pure or else how come Qur'an (5:4) on the other hand clearly allows using them for hunting?

They ask you, [O Muhammad], what has been made lawful for them. Say, "Lawful for you are [all] good foods and [game caught by] what you have trained of hunting animals which you train as Allah has taught you. So eat of what they catch for you, and mention the name of Allah upon it, and fear Allah ." Indeed, Allah is swift in account.

or in the clearer translation of Pickthall:

They ask thee (O Muhammad) what is made lawful for them. Say: (all) good things are made lawful for you. And those beasts and birds of prey which ye have trained as hounds are trained, ye teach them that which Allah taught you; so eat of that which they catch for you and mention Allah's name upon it, and observe your duty to Allah. Lo! Allah is swift to take account.

And dogs and bird of preys were known and used for hunting at the time!

In addition to that you'll find in both Sahihs this hadith which confirm this interpretation and teaches us how they should be used for hunting!

Here are two fatwas in Arabic one about eating the meat of the dog, and one about purity of spittle of a hunting dog, where you will find that the scholar only considered the spittle of the dog as impure!

And Allah knows best!

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .