Timeline for Consideration of weak hadiths
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2023 at 21:16 | comment | added | Greenix_3 | @Ganit Weak hadith can be used, as long it follows the condition as I have stated. Note that this is the first opinion. | |
| Dec 3, 2023 at 0:46 | history | edited | Greenix_3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
some refernece mistakes
|
| Dec 3, 2023 at 0:39 | history | edited | Greenix_3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2501 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2023 at 0:25 | history | edited | Greenix_3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
More detail and reference.
|
| Nov 28, 2023 at 23:28 | history | edited | Greenix_3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 89 characters in body
|
| Nov 28, 2023 at 6:42 | comment | added | Ganit | How come after so many years these weak hadiths are being promoted to authentic hadiths? Also if a person has a bad memory, how can they be taken as truthful? | |
| Nov 28, 2023 at 6:38 | history | edited | Greenix_3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 326 characters in body
|
| Nov 28, 2023 at 6:36 | comment | added | Greenix_3 | As shaikh albani has raised many weak hadith in their authenticity. | |
| Nov 28, 2023 at 6:36 | comment | added | Greenix_3 | Weak hadith can be raised up to sahih, according to the scholars. | |
| Nov 28, 2023 at 6:34 | comment | added | Greenix_3 | And it can be the opposite as well | |
| Nov 28, 2023 at 6:25 | comment | added | Ganit | Ok! So you mean that they are not verified to be 100% authentic, right? Now that so many years have passed, I doubt that "weak" hadiths' authenticity can be confirmed now. They can't be verified now | |
| Nov 28, 2023 at 6:22 | comment | added | Ganit | To quote "Note that there may be hadith that are weak in chains but sahih in matn. (text)", can you please elaborate this? | |
| Nov 28, 2023 at 6:21 | history | edited | Greenix_3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 110 characters in body
|
| Nov 28, 2023 at 6:14 | history | answered | Greenix_3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |