Timeline for Do all possible heirs always get a share or is it possible that some may go out empty?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2019 at 22:52 | vote | accept | ياsr | ||
| Feb 25, 2019 at 19:29 | answer | added | UmH♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 28, 2019 at 11:00 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 29, 2019 at 4:41 | |||||
| Jan 28, 2019 at 7:48 | history | edited | ياsr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 88 characters in body
|
| Jan 28, 2019 at 7:47 | comment | added | ياsr | @HosamAly good point I will exclude that. | |
| Jan 28, 2019 at 7:47 | comment | added | ياsr | @UmH if you could provide a hikmah that would be great, I had in mind an explanation with an example in first place, if the cases where different of cours an example for each. | |
| Jan 27, 2019 at 16:39 | comment | added | Hosam Aly | In addition to the "normal" cases described by @UmH, there are other unusual circumstances, e.g. when an heir is not a Muslim, when a child is unlawful, or when an heir had killed the diseased. | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 9:11 | comment | added | UmH♦ | No they do not, for example in the presence of the father or a son, the deceased's siblings do not receive a share. Do you require a complete list or just an example to illustrate the point? Also in your second question are you asking for hikmah behind it or are you asking for the basis of the ruling? | |
| Jan 24, 2019 at 18:48 | history | edited | Medi1Saif♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 24, 2019 at 14:18 | history | asked | ياsr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |