Timeline for Are there any cases where only male witnesses are allowed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 17, 2020 at 9:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
S Jun 30, 2019 at 12:34 | history | bounty ended | UmH♦ | ||
S Jun 30, 2019 at 12:34 | history | notice removed | UmH♦ | ||
Jun 30, 2019 at 11:30 | vote | accept | Medi1Saif♦ | ||
Jun 30, 2019 at 11:29 | answer | added | Jamila | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 23, 2019 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackIslam/status/1142854870032113667 | ||
S Jun 23, 2019 at 17:59 | history | bounty started | UmH♦ | ||
S Jun 23, 2019 at 17:59 | history | notice added | UmH♦ | Authoritative reference needed | |
Aug 14, 2018 at 17:17 | comment | added | Medi1Saif♦ | @Armaan Nice input! Maybe a partial answer? | |
Aug 14, 2018 at 17:13 | history | edited | Medi1Saif♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Aug 14, 2018 at 15:06 | comment | added | Muslim_1234 | In Bidayatu’l-Mujtahid, Ibn Rushd suggests that in the case of hudud, most scholars regard women's testimony as unacceptable regardless of whether they testify alongside male witnesses. | |
Aug 13, 2018 at 21:54 | comment | added | Muslim_1234 | Regarding 4:15, some translations suggest male witnesses but I'm not sure on the reliability. | |
Aug 13, 2018 at 14:19 | history | edited | Medi1Saif♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 160 characters in body
|
Aug 13, 2018 at 12:22 | history | edited | Casanova | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Aug 13, 2018 at 9:17 | history | asked | Medi1Saif♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |