- 'If anyone has a child born to him, and wants to sacrifice for his child, then let him do it.' (Muwatta' Malik and sunan abi Dawod)
- "Every boy is pawned against his 'Aqiqah, to be slaughtered on his behalf on the seventh day of his birth, his head is to be shaved, and he must be given a name."
Related by the five Imams (Ahmad and the four Imams). At-Tirmidhi graded it as Sahih. (Bulugh al-Maram)
- They entered upon Hafsah bint 'Abdur-Rahman to ask her about the 'Aqiqah. She informed them that 'Aishah had informed her, that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) ordered them that for a boy, two sheep were sufficient, and for a girl one sheep. (Jami' at-Trimdhi)
- "Every boy is pawned against his 'Aqiqah, to be slaughtered on his behalf on the seventh day of his birth, his head is to be shaved, and he must be given a name."
Related by the five Imams (Ahmad and the four Imams). At-Tirmidhi graded it as Sahih. (Bulugh al-Maram)
- They entered upon Hafsah bint 'Abdur-Rahman to ask her about the 'Aqiqah. She informed them that 'Aishah had informed her, that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) ordered them that for a boy, two sheep were sufficient, and for a girl one sheep. (Jami' at-Trimdhi)
In his commentary on sahih Muslimcommentary on sahih Muslim imam an-Nawawi discussed the fiqh of this hadith saying that there is a dispute about the permission for sharing a sacrifice of Hady (in Hajj) a Shafi'i held the opinion that it is permissible no matter if it is a hady which is wajib (ordered on him) or nafl (optional), no matter if the people sharing it are doing it for the sake of Allah or just to eat flesh, Ahmad and a majority of scholars followed this opinion. Some malikis and Dawod said it is permissible for an optional hady. Malik held the opinion that this sis not permissible (note that he has compiled the hadith). Abu Hanifa held the opinion that this is permissible if they wanted to sacrifice it for the sake of Allah. And all are in consensus that sharing a sheep is not permissible.
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: It is not acceptable to share an ‘aqeeqah, so it is not acceptable to offer a camel on behalf of two or a cow on behalf of two, so it is less likely to be acceptable on behalf of three or four. The reason for that is:
Firstly that there is no report of sharing an ‘aqeeqah, and acts of worship are based on following the texts.
Firstly that there is no report of sharing an ‘aqeeqah, and acts of worship are based on following the texts.
Secondly it is a ransom, and a ransom cannot be divided. It is a ransom on behalf of a soul, and if the ransom is on behalf of a soul, it must also be a soul.
Secondly it is a ransom, and a ransom cannot be divided. It is a ransom on behalf of a soul, and if the ransom is on behalf of a soul, it must also be a soul.
No doubt the first reason is stronger, because if there was a report to indicate that an ‘aqeeqah could be shared, then the second reason would become invalid, so the basis of the ruling is that there is no report to indicate that. (source: islamqa #82607)
No doubt the first reason is stronger, because if there was a report to indicate that an ‘aqeeqah could be shared, then the second reason would become invalid, so the basis of the ruling is that there is no report to indicate that. (source: islamqa #82607)