Timeline for What is meant by "touch" in this hadith?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| S Jun 22, 2017 at 8:38 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 22, 2017 at 8:38 | history | unlocked | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 22, 2017 at 6:54 | comment | added | goldPseudo | <comments deleted> Comments are intended for seeking clarification and constructive criticism with the intent of improving the post, not for arguing controversial points or discussing site policy. | |
| S Jun 22, 2017 at 6:52 | history | notice added | goldPseudo | Comments only | |
| S Jun 22, 2017 at 6:52 | history | locked | goldPseudo | ||
| Jun 21, 2017 at 23:41 | comment | added | Aboudi | I think one rule in Fiqh when it comes to contradicatory rulings is to follow the strongest evidence, therefore in the Hadths cited which ones are the most authentic? | |
| Jun 21, 2017 at 23:40 | comment | added | Aboudi | +1 Well presented argument, the Hadith tends to be quoted by scholars to support the prohibition of shaking hands with non-mahram women however it is interesting that the other Hadiths cited mention that the profit held hands with non-mahram women, I have never heard a scholar bring the Hadiths up when dealing with the topic of hand shaking! | |
| Jun 21, 2017 at 23:13 | history | edited | Kilise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Jun 21, 2017 at 17:23 | vote | accept | Kilise | ||
| Jun 21, 2017 at 17:48 | |||||
| Jun 21, 2017 at 17:23 | history | edited | Kilise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 446 characters in body
|
| Jun 21, 2017 at 17:15 | history | edited | Kilise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 446 characters in body
|
| May 23, 2017 at 11:09 | comment | added | Kilise | @Medi1Saif I totally agree. One should consider the context, as i mentioned in my comment on the below answer. I am not claiming the word مس means sex by itself, but it is a word which one may use to mean sex, without mentioning it. What I show in my answer is that the possibility of interpreting مس as sex does exist. And by knowing that, it opens up interpretation for the mentioned Hadith. Basically I argue that the word مس in the Hadith rather is the "friendly word" which is understood to mean sex as you said. And as you surely know there are scholars who hold this view such as Ali Gooma. | |
| May 23, 2017 at 10:28 | comment | added | Medi1Saif♦ | Please note that the language of the quran when it comes to intimacy and relationships, us rather friendly, maybe vague and clean, So if touch is used instead of having sex that doesn't by default mean مس means being intimate it only shows a somewhat synonym which doesn't sound vulgaire but means the same. | |
| May 22, 2017 at 12:48 | history | edited | Kilise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 255 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2017 at 12:42 | history | answered | Kilise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |