Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 23, 2017 at 12:01 history edited اللهم صل علی محمد و آل محمد CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Feb 16, 2017 at 4:08 comment added infatuated @Honey I agree with your points and I already said in my answer that Shia scholars seldom approve of harsh measures.
Feb 15, 2017 at 4:31 comment added Thaqalain Yes but at those times there was a prophet/Imam who preached the religion completely and clearly. How can we enforce the same punishment for when we don't have the same quality of teaching. Do you even know if they all know Hijab is good, Do they know of it to the full extent? (e.g. Imam Ali didn't punish a man who drank wine, because he simply wasn't informed). I highly doubt the 45 percent poll is true. I'm sure if we get it from another non-government-supporting resource the results would be different. But it would just be my word against yours...
Feb 15, 2017 at 4:09 comment added infatuated @Honey, enforcing can be harsh and can gentle. Indeed in Sunnah, there are both harsh (as in whipping) and gentle (as in charitable preaching موعظه الحسنه) measures but which method applies where depends on many things. And given that you have also the doctrine of enjoining good and discouraging evil in Shia fiqh, then you can get how complicated the case could be!
Feb 15, 2017 at 4:07 comment added Thaqalain "Iran has failed to enforce this law uniformly on its citizens" how do you apply that to لا اکراه فی الدین what if these people don't want to be Muslims or want to be Muslims but aren't up for hijab (I don't accept their idea). Yet the idea of enforcing seems harsh. I mean what good is it going to do other than making them hate Islam and their government
Feb 13, 2017 at 11:22 history answered infatuated CC BY-SA 3.0