Timeline for Which scholars argue that mentioning Gods name while slaughtering is not obligatory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2017 at 19:16 | vote | accept | Kilise | ||
| Jun 23, 2017 at 19:16 | answer | added | UmH♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 23, 2017 at 19:08 | vote | accept | Kilise | ||
| Jun 23, 2017 at 19:16 | |||||
| Jun 23, 2017 at 18:15 | answer | added | UmH♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 10, 2017 at 13:07 | comment | added | Kilise | @Medi1Saif I guess one could interpret the verse and the hadith in different ways, as the scholars seems to have done. But this question is more an attempt to list the scholars who holds the opinion, that mentioning Gods name isn't obligatory/mandatory - even if its the right opinion or not. | |
| Feb 10, 2017 at 12:56 | comment | added | Medi1Saif♦ | I guess the hadith posted by Jamila in her answer on islam.stackexchange.com/questions/37642/… could be considered as of generally use! And would mean it is not mandatory! | |
| Feb 2, 2017 at 8:43 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackIslam/status/827074951987462145 | ||
| Feb 2, 2017 at 0:25 | history | edited | Kilise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Feb 2, 2017 at 0:18 | history | edited | Kilise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Feb 2, 2017 at 0:11 | history | edited | Kilise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| Feb 2, 2017 at 0:06 | history | asked | Kilise | CC BY-SA 3.0 |