Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 27, 2017 at 22:11 comment added G. Bach "It's plausible that e.g. a better house could be purchased as a result of a monetary imbalance, which would benefit the whole family." Could you expand on that point? I don't understand it.
Jan 27, 2017 at 22:10 comment added G. Bach "This freedom may function as a self-correcting mechanism." The model doesn't suggest that will happen, and reality doesn't suggest this happens. "The above model suggests that men and women are somehow in an adversarial relationship, which is obviously not the case." The fiqh on when a husband can cease to sustain his wife - minor, occasional refusal to obey his halal demands - and all the other legal powers he has over the wife, and the fact that the wife has no legal powers over the husband whatsoever makes the system somewhat adversarial, and put the husband in a strong strategic position.
Jan 25, 2017 at 10:25 comment added Medi1Saif @Honey see what I mean in my posted answer-draft! The approach is/was not exactly what I was looking for, but it is a good scientific approach for analyzing such issues!
Jan 25, 2017 at 10:22 comment added Thaqalain @Medi1Saif nothing wrong with your comment. But if something is something is right then why do you need a scholar to say it? listen to what they say, not to whom has said it-Ali
Jan 25, 2017 at 7:00 comment added Medi1Saif I like this mathematical approach, but still hope to find at least a link to underline the statement I heard long ago as I'm curious how a scholar would explain it!
Jan 25, 2017 at 6:58 history edited Medi1Saif CC BY-SA 3.0
I assume you meant "and" instead of "are"
Jan 25, 2017 at 5:14 vote accept Medi1Saif
Apr 18, 2019 at 11:59
Jan 25, 2017 at 4:11 history answered Rebecca J. Stones CC BY-SA 3.0