Timeline for How do Islam followers justify religion over logic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 22:36 | comment | added | user-1289389812839 | In your example the question posed is how Muslims can say that "the moon split in two" when there are no events recorded by other civilizations despite observing and recording the sky at the same time. The first answer is stating the Quran is in fact probably referring to a future event because it frequently uses the 'past' to describe the 'future', without providing any sources except for the original comment. I want the source of this statement, so I can judge whether the statement is plausible or not. As it is right now, we have enough information to say that this seems highly implausible. | |
| Feb 16, 2017 at 20:09 | comment | added | user21196 | For example you can see this islam.stackexchange.com/questions/37683/…. I don't think anybody can explain the logic behind this.In order to believe in such things you need faith in Allah and his messenger | |
| Feb 16, 2017 at 19:47 | comment | added | user21196 | Islam is a religion which is entirely based on faith.I wonder how can you believe that Allah exists if you cannot see him.And if you believe someone then u do not need the logic behind it.And this faith comes inside anybody only by the wish of Allah.I know that u don't believe in Islam now but it will not even take a second for you to believe if Allah wills.And a day will come when you will know that Islam was truth.And maybe that day will be after you die. | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 0:38 | comment | added | user-1289389812839 | You take too much for granted. You are nowhere near correct when you speak about how I think regarding this answer (another unconfirmable 'fact' you lay on me). I want a Muslim to explain the logical reason behind implementing Islam. It is not logical to say that Islam can be confirmed, that it is the best system we have (provide proof for this claim otherwise). If you say that every Muslim is going to give me the same answer, then I will derive the answer out of that and say that Logic and Islam has broken their relation. | |
| Jan 15, 2017 at 14:07 | comment | added | Muslimah | Furthermore, dismissing my answer merely because I am a Muslim and pro-Islam is a type of ad hominem fallacy. And it’s strange that you want an answer from a ‘Muslim’ and yet then you turn around and say you reject an answer from a Muslim because of ‘bias’. In other words, you just want someone who you agree with to answer you, and not necessarily someone who is speaking accurately. | |
| Jan 15, 2017 at 14:07 | comment | added | Muslimah | You don’t have to like my answer but it definitely does answer the essence of your question which was why logically Islam should be implemented. I laid out why. Now, IF you claim that there is a system better than Islam then the burden of proof is on you to show us the system/model. I see no evidence of a better system than Islam. | |
| Jan 15, 2017 at 2:23 | comment | added | user-1289389812839 | I obviously had some false premise. However I explained in the edits that this was about a very specific group of Muslims. You rephrased my question in a way that it was easier for you to answer it, you did not capture the essence of the question. You are also implying that we have tried every possible system and that there is no system that can ever measure better than an Islam-regulated one, and that every single citizen wants Islam to rule. This answer is not relevant because of the obvious bias, and I'm not going to accept it as it is not satisfactory to the question posed. | |
| Jan 13, 2017 at 16:11 | history | answered | Muslimah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |