Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 23, 2022 at 5:57 answer added Umme Salma Muhammad Hanif timeline score: 0
Sep 12, 2017 at 5:26 history edited Rebecca J. Stones CC BY-SA 3.0
added 44 characters in body; edited tags
Jun 22, 2017 at 13:43 answer added Casanova timeline score: 2
Jun 22, 2017 at 5:10 answer added Rebecca J. Stones timeline score: 1
Jul 13, 2016 at 10:54 comment added Sassir @Envayo thanks, then I correct myself, Quran is secured the same way it has been done for sahih hadith (and partly still is these days) by tawatur. This is at least one of the known ways Allah has secured His book. If there are other's then Allah may know them best. But that was the way our early scholars, especially the sahaba and tabi'yn decided what is considered as an approved Quran reading and what is not. On the other hand I must admit that we shouldn't take all of the hadith literally and cross-check it with Quran.
Jul 12, 2016 at 5:44 comment added 0aslam0 @Envayo I partly agree with you. But since we have a platform like this, why not try at least? Best case scenario, some one gives me an answer. Else it remains unanswered, which tells me no body is interested in the question or the Hadith. Either way no harm done in asking right?
Jul 12, 2016 at 5:31 comment added 0aslam0 @Envayo That is a good thought. Does it increase my Imaan? Not really. But whenever someone gives you Islamic Knowledge and tells you this about Hadiths, you have to make sure they are authentic. Now, some hadiths are well known and accepted. Then there are some, that is not clear or raises your eyebrow. The above is such a one (for me at least). So if this is true, I could continue trusting the source of information, else I will have to interfere. Spreading a wrong Hadith is like spreading lies in the name of the Prophet (PBUH). Hope you understand
Jul 12, 2016 at 5:16 history edited 0aslam0 CC BY-SA 3.0
Added hadith
Jul 12, 2016 at 0:58 history asked 0aslam0 CC BY-SA 3.0