Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 2, 2023 at 7:21 answer added UmH timeline score: 2
Feb 28, 2023 at 16:06 answer added Ahlussunnah timeline score: -1
Apr 7, 2017 at 17:16 history tweeted twitter.com/StackIslam/status/850396859529089024
Apr 5, 2017 at 21:29 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Mar 6, 2017 at 20:54 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Feb 4, 2017 at 20:36 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jan 5, 2017 at 20:13 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Dec 6, 2016 at 19:56 answer added Eclectic Eccentric Kamikaze timeline score: -1
Oct 4, 2015 at 21:40 comment added Henry Williamson If I understand well the first part of your sentence, you haven't yet read the question completely. Please read it so that you can understand my point. Unless you admit that contradicting the text is a form of interpretation, I don't see how the quoted verses (4:12 and 4:176) could make sense considered the problem stated above. The verses do mention precise shares of inheritance (1/2, 2/3, 1/6, 1/8...), thus no discussion is possible regarding the value of the shares prescribed by the text.
Oct 3, 2015 at 5:35 comment added servant-of-Wiser Without even reading your question completely, there is no correcting Qur'an, the only thing you could do at the most is understand it properly or the way you want it to be understood i.e you can ask for various interpretations which interest you.
Oct 1, 2015 at 23:32 review First posts
Oct 31, 2015 at 23:29
Oct 1, 2015 at 23:29 history asked Henry Williamson CC BY-SA 3.0