Return to Question

I've been told that if someone dies, their assets MUST be divided amounts the heirs asap based on Islamic decision requirements otherwise the person who has died will be sinning for:

1. not ensuring a good will which asks the assets to be divided appropriately asap
2. the heirs who choose to not divide the assets are sinning and are causing sin to befall on the person who has died

Is this true?

I would appreciate views from the sunni > hanafi > deobandi view.

If the views of sunni > hanafi > brelvi are different, what is the difference?

I've been told that if someone dies, their assets MUST be divided correctly between the heirs asap based on Islamically outlined division percentages, otherwise the person(s) stopping the correct division (or stopping the division of the assets all together) of the assets are committing a major sin.

Is this true?

I would appreciate views from the sunni > hanafi > deobandi view.

I've been told that if someone dies, their assets MUST be divided amounts the heir asap based on Islamic requirements otherwise the person who has died will be sinning for:

1. not ensuring a good will which asks the assets to be divided appropriately asap
2. the hairs who choose to not divide the assets are sinning and are causing sin to befall on the person who has died

Is this true?

I would appreciate views from the sunni > hanafi > deobandi view.

If the views of sunni > hanafi > brelvi are different, what is the difference?

I've been told that if someone dies, their assets MUST be divided amounts the heirs asap based on Islamic decision requirements otherwise the person who has died will be sinning for:

1. not ensuring a good will which asks the assets to be divided appropriately asap
2. the heirs who choose to not divide the assets are sinning and are causing sin to befall on the person who has died

Is this true?

I would appreciate views from the sunni > hanafi > deobandi view.

If the views of sunni > hanafi > brelvi are different, what is the difference?